Dear Mr. Hawking...

For a man so brilliant Mr. Hawking tends to make some of the most ridiculous assertions based on simple observations made from an inadequate universal positioning.  To make it less difficult for certain weak minded evolutionist zeitgeists to understand, most of what he says is completely theoretical and not to be accepted, or even considered, scientific fact.  Why?  Because he does not control enough of the variables to prove such theories as fact, thus making them laws of physics.

Alas, we forget the history of scientific study.  One brilliant scientist makes a claim that is usually completely ridiculous, the people rave or riot because neither party actually understands the thinking of said scientist, and another more brilliant scientist comes along and either proves the previous scientist wrong or popularizes more propaganda to make a name for him/herself.  That said, this argument between religious purest and evolutionists is completely stupid.

For someone to claim another person is stupid for having faith in something that mathematically makes sense is stupid in itself.  What I'm saying is, leading mathematicians have stated that faith in a leading deity, whether that deity is the true God or not, usually leads the individuals involved down a path of prosperity and/or contentment.  This means they win, whether they are right or wrong.  They have something to believe in, have something to live for, have a goal to accomplish, acquire togetherness within their own belief circles, learn to share, cooperate, and find help with difficult tasks.  This is clearly a better way of life...gain.

Those who don't have any faith in anything spiritual are usually losing because they tend to be more reserved and removed from those around them who don't necessarily agree to their views or don't understand their reasoning, or lack thereof.  Many people without faith suffer some tragic fate, become social & legal delinquents, and are overall unhappy with the state of the world.  This isn't my personal opinion, rather that of the mathematicians, however, I do understand and respect the reasoning behind this.  This isn't true for every individual case BUT it is true as a generalization.  This is quite clear as a loss within the equation of human life.

Still, my point of view is in how both parties don't understand what true blind faith really is.  No matter if you are proud of the faith or are ashamed, the faith is there.  Simply put, if you believe the universe was born and expanded from nothing, which will inevitably cause it to collapse and decay into nothing, you are believing blindly in the origin and destruction of the universe as you can neither prove your claims and were not around to observe it personally.  There is no such thing as physical evidence that any man, woman, or child could possibly fathom as adequate enough to prove such a ridiculous notion. 

Apparently, under this logic, the LAWS of physics tend to bend around the wills of those who lack faith in a deity in order to support and gratify that individual.  This is even more ridiculous and, in fact, weakens your stance rather than strengthens it.  It is a physical LAW that you cannot create something from absolutely nothing.  It is also a physical LAW that anything aflame needs an adequate fuel source.  Another physical LAW is that every action has an equal and opposite reaction.  Therefor, the big bang theory AND the big bounce theory are completely ridiculous to someone who knows and understands these key things.

Einstein disappeared after making these observations making such a statements, essentially meaning: Man's will to disprove the existence of a higher power, through scientific study, shall inevitably steer him on a collision course with God.

That's like a Darwinist stating that life "evolved" from previously inadament objects.  I'll express how ridiculous THIS is also, for the sake of argument.  If I bury the remote control to my television set for the better part of of 2 billion years, will that piece of equipment then emerge as its own being?  No.  We've learned that by the observation of fossils.  The being that the fossil once belonged to had a head start and still its remains became nothing more than dust, as opposed to springing to life again as a new creature.  If there is no life in it, there shall never be life in it no matter how long you wait.

That said, life is not a random universal phenomenon, it can't be because it breaks the laws of physics.  That being the case, someTHING intelligent and transient MUST have designed it.  A logical deduction is that THING, or deity, created all of these laws and set them indefinitely for duration of the life of the universe itself.  Since matter can neither be created or destroyed something obviously had to design it and place it withing the cosmos.  The cosmos are understood to be devoid of anything that isn't dust, radiation, some form of positive energy, and celestial bodies.  If that's true we're floating around on a ball of water, dirt, and gas that sits out in the middle of nothingness...a void...something that exists to not exist.

The concept of God is a logical paradox and no person is capable of understanding it just as no person is capable of understanding the structure, life, and eventual death of the universe.  Whether the universe is God or God created the universe is completely inconsequential at this point.  What matters is we exist, we think, we feel, we birth life, we die, we learn, and we evolve.  That isn't random, there is an order to it.

I'd rather not take the word of the man who 1) Isn't the most intelligent person on the planet, 2) Teaches the existence of black holes as fact when HE, himself, can't even actually OBSERVE the black hole, rather observe the elliptical behavior of the objects around a center of gravity...much like the behavior of our solar system (which doesn't have a black hole in it), and 3) Was renowned for having ridiculed the idea of God and those who believed in God, setting out to disprove the existence of God, and then as he entered his prime with such an objective, was stricken with the worse case of muscular dystrophy the modern world has ever seen.  I don't know if it's cruel situational irony or a punishment from a supreme being (or both lol) but he appears to be less and less credible every time he thinks to express the thoughts floating around his decrepit mind.

My mind is mad deep and you can't swim...

I'm BACK, BITCHES!!!!!

Did he really just say that?!!

Yes!  Yes, he did!  He DID just say that!